| The
company required benchmarking of its proposed strategy/structure
against other research based biopharmaceutical companies that
had already achieved a similar therapeutic focus. Particular
attention was paid as to how such companies have been valued
over time, and to support the board in the development of
an implementation strategy for the future corporate structure.
The
objectives for the client
-
Gain an independent view on the proposed
corporate strategy and structure.
-
Assess the likely reaction of the financial
community to the planned strategic shift prior to implementation.
-
Develop an implementation strategy that
would maximise the companies long-term revenue generation
and value whilst enhancing market perception and short-term
valuation.
The programme of work
-
Internal meetings with key staff and
review of business, development and marketing plans in
order to develop an independent view on the company's
capabilities, technology platforms, intellectual property,
products and their commercial potential.
-
An independent programme of desk research
and expert interviews to further validate the view of
the commercial potential for key strategic products and
technologies.
-
Selection of appropriate benchmark companies
(together with client).
-
A combination of further desk research
and expert interviews to explore the activities, strengths
and weaknesses of the benchmark companies and to review
their valuation over time.
-
Interviews with financial analysts and
other members of the financial community to establish
current value drivers and identify those factors that
tend to influence market sentiment.
-
Strategic workshops with senior members
of the management team.
|
|
The
deliverables to the client |
-
A comprehensive report addressing
the company's stated objectives above.
-
Recommendations to the board on
alternative models by which the company could restructure
its current biopharmaceutical business to maximise
share holder value in line with current value drivers
and market sentiment.
|
| |
The
project achievements |
-
The company did not implement its
original strategy which, according to Bridgehead
Consulting's analysis, could have resulted in a
greater than 65% fall in enterprise value.
-
The company is currently implementing
a strategy which should maximise long-term market
value without undermining current enterprise value.
Added value
Bridgehead Consulting's findings ensured
that the company did not implement a strategy that would
have undermined the fundamental value of the company.
Bridgehead Consulting's advice was critical in supporting
the company in developing alternative strategies that
would enhance shareholder value. |
| |
|